The Critical Role of NEPLOs in Every State
Preparedness: NEPLOs are not just responders; their key role is in the planning and coordination that occurs before disasters strike. Even for low-probability events like the Cascadia Earthquake in the Pacific Northwest, where there's only a 37% chance it will happen in the next 50 years, the devastation will be severe when it does occur. NEPLOs are essential in the ongoing coordination between FEMA and DoD in preparing for such an event.
Backup NEPLOs: If disaster strikes, local NEPLOs may be directly affected, as seen with NRNW NEPLOs. In those moments, backup NEPLOs from other regions must step in. However, due to budget restraints, we have been unable to fully exercise and train these backup NEPLOs. When local NEPLOs are incapacitated, someone needs to respond – and cutting back on NEPLOs in any state could leave us dangerously unprepared.
Consistency in DCO Training: There is a clear need for standardized training and expectations for DCOs. Some DCOs request additional drills on top of already demanding NEPLO responsibilities. The bandwidth for SELRES personnel is limited, and we are asking too much of NEPLOs to support multiple DCOs without standardization, risking burnout and inefficiency.
Support at All Times: NEPLOs are critical before, during, and after disasters, even when they aren’t activated. For events like the Eastern Kentucky floods or the Maryland Bridge collapse, NEPLOs coordinated extensively to prepare for potential activation, ensuring readiness in case the call came. Much of this critical work is done without compensation, highlighting their professionalism and commitment.
Comparison with Other Reserve Units: While NEPLOs may not frequently mobilize in support of DSCA events, they are similar to other reserve units that often remain in a constant state of readiness without being activated. Like many military reserve components, their value isn't measured solely by how often they are mobilized, but by their continuous preparation, training, and planning. NEPLOs are always on standby, ensuring readiness to respond when the call comes, and this unseen but vital work mirrors the readiness posture of reserve units that train for years without deploying. Cutting back on NEPLOs would undermine this critical state of preparedness and leave gaps in national disaster response.
Conclusion: NEPLOs must remain in every state, prepared to respond to events both expected and unforeseen. Their presence and preparedness efforts are the cornerstone of disaster readiness across the nation. Reducing their numbers or cutting back on their involvement jeopardizes our ability to respond effectively when the inevitable disaster occurs.
Comments